Author(s): Milkoreit, M.
In: SEI Working Paper 2012-04
Type: Working paper
Link to SEI author(s):
What’s the mind got to do with it? A cognitive approach to global climate governance
This paper explores the importance of cognition – processes of thought – for both past political conflicts and the possibility of future cooperation on climate change within the multilateral system.
After more than 20 years of unsuccessful international negotiations, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) might be one of the biggest, and maybe most important, global governance failures of our time.
Why is this problem so hard to tackle? Starting with the assumption that all human behaviour has cognitive origins, this paper begins to explore what analyses of cognitive processes could teach us about the climate talks – and how they might be made more successful.
After a brief outline of the fundamental questions that a cognitive research programme could and should answer, the paper introduces cognitive-affective mapping as a novel research tool that can facilitate such a programme by providing ‘access to the mind’.
Cognitive-affective maps open up a wealth of analytical opportunities, including a comparison of individual and collective belief systems and mental structures that might inhibit cooperative outcomes at the international level. The paper concludes with a brief summary of ongoing research that seeks to identify distinct belief systems regarding international cooperation on climate change among participants in the UNFCCC negotiations, using cognitive-affective mapping.
Download the paper (PDF, 926kb)
About SEI Working Papers:
The SEI working paper series aims to expand and accelerate the availability of our research, stimulate discussion, and elicit feedback. SEI working papers are work in progress and typically contain preliminary research, analysis, findings, and recommendations.
Many SEI working papers are drafts that will be subsequently revised for a refereed journal or book. Other papers share timely and innovative knowledge that we consider valuable and policy-relevant, but which may not be intended for later publication.